Chief Justice Roberts, in his dissent yesterday in Armour v. City of Indianapolis, Indiana raises unanswered questions about the future of the Court’s review of economic regulations. Continue reading
-
Recent Posts
- Greenhouse Gas Case Sparks Double Dissent from Denial of Rehearing En Banc
- Reply: Political Question Answer to Recess Appointment Test
- Today’s Opinion: Court Upholds SSA’s Nondisclosure of Top Employers of Undocumented Workers
- D.C. Circuit Mulls Challenge to NLRB Recess Appointments
- Today’s Opinions: FCC Data Roaming Rule and NLRB Discovery Order Upheld
- Wallach on Chevron Deference and “Muddling Through”
- Chief Judge Sentelle to Take Senior Status
Categories
- Blog Review (10)
- Law Review Review (14)
- News (94)
- Case News (51)
- Cert Watch (16)
- Oral Argument Report (7)
- Supreme Court Review (8)
- Court News (16)
- Judicial News (33)
- National News (9)
- Weekend Review (2)
- Case News (51)
- Case Analysis (44)
Archives
