More than one third of the Supreme Court clerks for October Term 2012 will be former D.C. Circuit clerks Continue reading
Posted in Court News, Judicial News, News
Tagged clerkship, court size, feeder judge, Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, Judge David S. Tatel, Judge Janice Rogers Brown, Judge Merrick B. Garland, Judge Thomas B. Griffith, law clerk, second highest court, Supreme Court
Chief Judge David Sentelle will participate in a panel entitled “Privacy vs. Free Speech in the Age of Mass Media, 21st Century Communications and Social Media,” this Saturday, October 29, from 2:00-4:00pm at the Washington Post Conference Center, 1150 15th ST., NW, Washington, D.C. Continue reading
Posted in Case News, Judicial News, News, Supreme Court Review
Tagged 08-3030, 08-3034, Chief Judge David B. Sentelle, dissent from denial of rehearing en banc, Fourth Amendment, GPS, privacy, speaking engagements, Supreme Court
Justice Scalia was honored yesterday for 25 years on the Supreme Court. But his judicial career started four years before his elevation to the Supreme Court. President Ronald Reagan nominated Professor Antonin Scalia to the D.C. Circuit on July 15, 1982. He was confirmed by the Senate (98-0) on August 5, 1982, and sworn into office on August 17, 1982.
In retrospect, it is no surprise that the Great Dissenter‘s first published opinion was a dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc. Washington Post Co. v. U.S. Dept. of State, 685 F.2d 698, 707 (D.C. Cir. 1982), vacated, 104 S.Ct. 418 (1983). The panel opinion had held, before Scalia even joined the Court, that Exemption 3 of the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) did not protect the State Department from the Washington Post’s request for certain financial records, and that subsequent legislation had failed to bring them within the Exemption’s protection.
In two short pages of classic Scalia dissent, the novice jurist argued that a more recent statute, which imposed “the most detailed limitations” on the release of the relevant records, had effectively removed the records from FOIA’s general presumption of access. Judge Scalia lambasted the panel opinion for its reliance on “legislative history alone” and for its “perverse result.” Id. For his part, Scalia relied on “traditional canons of interpretation” and on the “congressionally approved tradition and practice of confidentiality in foreign affairs matters.” Id. He expressed a now-familiar concern for “the development of a coherent body of law,” and even hinted that deference to the Executive Branch’s statutory interpretation might be in order. (“The language of Exemption 3 would certainly bear the interpretation the Government urged.”). Id. Judge Scalia seems to have arrived at the D.C. Circuit with his enduring judicial philosophy already fully formed.
Judge Scalia left the D.C. Circuit in September 1986 to become the 103rd Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court. Yesterday, Chief Justice Roberts quipped, “[t]he place has not been the same since.” Neither place has.
(Hat Tip: Lyle Denniston, SCOTUSblog)