Tag Archives: EAJA

Does a Dissenting Vote for the Government Prove its Position was “Substantially Justified”?

Posted on November 9, 2012 | Leave a comment

Taxpayers who prevailed on appeal in their challenge to the IRS’s scheme for refunding an unlawful telephone excise tax won’t get attorneys’ fees from the Government. Continue reading →

Leave a comment

Posted in Case Analysis

Tagged , , , , , , , ,